Review and update the documentation, policy, training, and supervisory oversight related to the pointing of firearms at a person.Continue the processes established for the CSPD’s Use of Force Committee for comprehensive and routine reviews and updates to policy and communicate this work internally and externally.Enhance agency culture that emphasizes, reinforces, and rewards the use of de-escalation tactics and skills by officers through systematic documentation, continual reinforcement of policies and training, and development of accountability and oversight mechanisms.Transparency Matters made the following recommendations for CSPD, as quoted from the report: The remaining 13 percent were marked by the agency as "inappropriate" for reasons ranging from the failure to use de-escalation techniques to a lack of cause for the officer to use a lethal weapon.Īll of the reports were approved by supervisors, showing further oversight is needed, researchers said. Of those reports, researchers deemed 77 percent justified. Transparency Matters studied 140 randomly selected reports involving a firearm being pointed at an individual. The only recommendation with regards to best practices was to release an annual report on use of force, which CSPD said it plans to do.Ī key area of focus in the report was data surrounding the pointing of a firearm. However, they did compare best practices and standards with other cities with overall positive results. Researchers said it's not an equal comparison to do so. The study did not compare CSPD's use of force data to similar cities. ".and the reason for that is because I cannot get into an officer's head." She says her team can measure racial and ethnic disparities, but cannot measure officer bias. "Bias indicates that the reason for those differences is because of, in this case, an officer's prejudice or a favoring over one thing or another." "You can have racial and ethnic disparities without having bias," Engle said. Robin Engel, lead researcher for Transparency Matters, emphasized that a disparity of any size between groups does not equate to bias within the department, as bias in itself cannot be measured. The report uses data provided by the CSPD between 20. Results were expected last fall, but the audit was delayed after the police department asked for more input from officers. Researchers also said CSPD is a leader in its field when it comes to training models surrounding the use of force and prohibiting the use of chokeholds.ĬSPD hired outside consulting group Transparency Matters more than a year ago to look into the department's use of force, including demographic data and potential disparities. The Colorado Springs Police Department has "very minor or no racial/ethnic disparities in use of force for both Black and Hispanic individuals compared to (w)hite individuals." That's the conclusion of an audit on how CSPD uses force, released Tuesday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |